Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RLUSX
FWMMX vs RLUSX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RLUSX
FWMMX vs RLUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RLUSX (78.1M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RLUSX: FWMMX (1.41) vs RLUSX (0.56). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RLUSX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RLUSX (12 years). RLUSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RLUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLUSX: FWMMX (250) vs RLUSX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. RLUSX (3.84). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.18 vs. RLUSX (16.99).
| FWMMX | RLUSX | FWMMX / RLUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.70 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.78 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.131 | 7.798 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 78.1M | 279,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.56 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 3.84 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.71 | 28.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 16.99 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers