Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSEAX
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSEAX
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSEAX (3.05B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RSEAX (0.44). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSEAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RSEAX (14 years). RSEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSEAX (0) vs FWMMX (250). RSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. FWMMX (7.00). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.91 vs. RSEAX (9.14).
| FWMMX | RSEAX | FWMMX / RSEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.18 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 8.517 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.05B | 7,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.44 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 10.50 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 31.79 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 9.14 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement