Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSEAX
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSEAX
FWMMX vs RSEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RSEAX (3.12B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RSEAX (0.44). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSEAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RSEAX (14 years). RSEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSEAX (0) vs FWMMX (250). RSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. FWMMX (8.07). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.24 vs. RSEAX (12.64).
| FWMMX | RSEAX | FWMMX / RSEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.18 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 9.887 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 3.12B | 6,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.44 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 12.71 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 35.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 12.64 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers