Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSECX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-2
Price$66.28
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$17.60
Change-$0.13 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.23B
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. RSECX (3.23B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWMMX (1.38) vs RSECX (0.04). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWMMX (5 years) vs RSECX (13 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSECX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. RSECX (-2.13). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 47.46 vs. RSECX (24.25).
| FWMMX | RSECX | FWMMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.85 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.493 | 9.794 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 3.23B | 6,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.04 | 3,560% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | -2.13 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.40 | 30.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.46 | 24.25 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement