Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RSECX (3.06B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWMMX (1.39) vs RSECX (0.08). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RSECX (14 years). RSECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSECX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. RSECX (3.88). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. RSECX (3.81).
| FWMMX | RSECX | FWMMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.83 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.93 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.996 | 9.074 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 3.06B | 7,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.08 | 1,750% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 3.88 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 22.50 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.36 | 3.81 | 824% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers