Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSECX
FWMMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSECX (3.05B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RSECX (0.08). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RSECX (14 years). RSECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSECX (0) vs FWMMX (250). RSECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. FWMMX (7.00). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.91 vs. RSECX (5.07).
| FWMMX | RSECX | FWMMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.83 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.93 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 8.155 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.05B | 7,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.08 | 1,727% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 9.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 28.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 5.07 | 570% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement