Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RSESX
FWMMX vs RSESX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RSESX
FWMMX vs RSESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSESX (3.09B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RSESX: FWMMX (1.39) vs RSESX (0.56). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RSESX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RSESX (14 years). RSESX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RSESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). RSESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RSESX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. RSESX (6.09). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.26 vs. RSESX (10.75).
| FWMMX | RSESX | FWMMX / RSESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.83 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 11.652 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.09B | 7,057% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.56 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 6.09 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 34.18 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.26 | 10.75 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers