Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RTDCX (287M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RTDCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs RTDCX (0.23). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RTDCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RTDCX (8 years). RTDCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDCX (25.00). RTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RTDCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. RTDCX (-9.58). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. RTDCX (-13.46).
| FWMMX | RTDCX | FWMMX / RTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 11.019 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 287M | 76,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.23 | 603% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -9.58 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | -8.29 | -350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -13.46 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement