Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RTDCX (286M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RTDCX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RTDCX (0.23). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RTDCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RTDCX (8 years). RTDCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDCX (25.00). RTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RTDCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. RTDCX (-6.57). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. RTDCX (-12.38).
| FWMMX | RTDCX | FWMMX / RTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 9.585 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 286M | 76,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.23 | 592% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | -6.57 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | -5.85 | -520% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | -12.38 | -243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETEC | 31.25 | 0.57 | +1.85% |
| iShares Breakthrough Envirtl Sol ETF | |||
| IGF | 66.38 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| DGT | 185.21 | -0.47 | -0.26% |
| State Street® SPDR® Global Dow ETF | |||
| CHIQ | 16.65 | -0.22 | -1.30% |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF | |||
| ABNG | 17.12 | -0.82 | -4.57% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Abnb Daily ETF | |||