Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RTDCX
FWMMX vs RTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RTDCX (283M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RTDCX: FWMMX (1.39) vs RTDCX (0.23). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RTDCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RTDCX (8 years). RTDCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDCX (25.00). RTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RTDCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. RTDCX (-10.77). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. RTDCX (-14.31).
| FWMMX | RTDCX | FWMMX / RTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.996 | 10.642 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 283M | 77,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.23 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | -10.77 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | -9.99 | -279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.36 | -14.31 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers