Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RTDRX
FWMMX vs RTDRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RTDRX
FWMMX vs RTDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RTDRX (280M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RTDRX: FWMMX (1.41) vs RTDRX (1.03). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RTDRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RTDRX (10 years). RTDRX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDRX (25.00). RTDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RTDRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. RTDRX (-11.38). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. RTDRX (-12.29).
| FWMMX | RTDRX | FWMMX / RTDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.47 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.49 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 10.027 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 280M | 78,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.03 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | -11.38 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.28 | -8.05 | -339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | -12.29 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement