Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RTDRX
FWMMX vs RTDRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RTDRX
FWMMX vs RTDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RTDRX (293M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RTDRX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RTDRX (1.02). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RTDRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RTDRX (10 years). RTDRX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDRX (25.00). RTDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RTDRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. RTDRX (-3.50). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.24 vs. RTDRX (-7.58).
| FWMMX | RTDRX | FWMMX / RTDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.47 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.49 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 11.874 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 293M | 73,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.02 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | -3.50 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 0.02 | 176,375% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | -7.58 | -386% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFUV | 54.35 | 0.50 | +0.93% |
| Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | |||
| DFCA | 50.16 | 0.05 | +0.11% |
| Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| RVNU | 25.08 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF | |||
| GSIG | 47.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Inv Gd Cp 1-5Yr Bd ETF | |||
| VNIE | 25.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Vontobel International Equity Active ETF | |||