Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RUSTX
FWMMX vs RUSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RUSTX
FWMMX vs RUSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. RUSTX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and RUSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RUSTX (3.08B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RUSTX: FWMMX (1.38) vs RUSTX (0.63). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RUSTX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RUSTX (10 years). RUSTX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RUSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). RUSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: RUSTX (0) vs FWMMX (250). RUSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. FWMMX (2.05). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. RUSTX (10.51).
| FWMMX | RUSTX | FWMMX / RUSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 11.972 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.08B | 7,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.63 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 3.36 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 32.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 10.51 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers