Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs SPINX
FWMMX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs SPINX
FWMMX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. SPINX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and SPINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SPINX (4.27B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than SPINX: FWMMX (1.38) vs SPINX (1.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than SPINX: FWMMX (6 years) vs SPINX (13 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPINX (5.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: FWMMX (250) vs SPINX (100000). SPINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. FWMMX (2.05). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. SPINX (5.88).
| FWMMX | SPINX | FWMMX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.05 | 700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.12 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 11.725 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.27B | 5,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.00 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 5.17 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 18.40 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 5.88 | 510% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement