Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs SPUSX
FWMMX vs SPUSX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs SPUSX
FWMMX vs SPUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SPUSX (447M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than SPUSX: FWMMX (1.37) vs SPUSX (0.67). FWMMX was incepted earlier than SPUSX: FWMMX (6 years) vs SPUSX (8 years). SPUSX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SPUSX (18.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPUSX: FWMMX (250) vs SPUSX (1000). SPUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.78 vs. FWMMX (8.10). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. SPUSX (28.41).
| FWMMX | SPUSX | FWMMX / SPUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 13.024 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 447M | 48,770% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.67 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 19.78 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 38.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 28.41 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement