Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs SSFRX
FWMMX vs SSFRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs SSFRX
FWMMX vs SSFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. SSFRX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and SSFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SSFRX (16.7B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than SSFRX: FWMMX (1.38) vs SSFRX (0.55). FWMMX was incepted earlier than SSFRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs SSFRX (21 years). SSFRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSFRX (2.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSFRX: FWMMX (250) vs SSFRX (25000000). SSFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.62 vs. FWMMX (2.05). SSFRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.42 vs. FWMMX (29.94).
| FWMMX | SSFRX | FWMMX / SSFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.62 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 12.268 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 16.7B | 1,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.55 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 16.62 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 74.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 73.42 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 244.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers