Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs TCEPX
FWMMX vs TCEPX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs TCEPX
FWMMX vs TCEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TCEPX (60.5B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than TCEPX: FWMMX (1.37) vs TCEPX (0.96). FWMMX was incepted earlier than TCEPX: FWMMX (6 years) vs TCEPX (17 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than TCEPX (0.19). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TCEPX (7.00). TCEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: TCEPX (0) vs FWMMX (250). TCEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.47 vs. FWMMX (8.07). TCEPX return over 5 years is better than : 75.82 vs. FWMMX (29.24).
| FWMMX | TCEPX | FWMMX / TCEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.19 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.19 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 11.391 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 60.5B | 354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.96 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 27.47 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 78.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 75.82 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 262.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement