Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs TLASX
FWMMX vs TLASX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs TLASX
FWMMX vs TLASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TLASX (181M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than TLASX: FWMMX (1.41) vs TLASX (0.59). FWMMX was incepted earlier than TLASX: FWMMX (6 years) vs TLASX (3 years). TLASX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). TLASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). TLASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: TLASX (0) vs FWMMX (250). TLASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. FWMMX (5.72).
| FWMMX | TLASX | FWMMX / TLASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 11.396 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 181M | 120,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.59 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 6.67 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 13.54 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement