Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs TMLCX
FWMMX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs TMLCX
FWMMX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TMLCX (4.61B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: FWMMX (1.37) vs TMLCX (0.60). FWMMX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs TMLCX (28 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: FWMMX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. FWMMX (8.07). TMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.84 vs. FWMMX (29.24).
| FWMMX | TMLCX | FWMMX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 8.762 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.61B | 4,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.60 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 22.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 43.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 31.84 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 138.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement