Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs TMLCX
FWMMX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs TMLCX
FWMMX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TMLCX (4.59B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs TMLCX (0.60). FWMMX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs TMLCX (28 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: FWMMX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. FWMMX (5.72). FWMMX (30.58) and TMLCX (29.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWMMX | TMLCX | FWMMX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 9.195 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.59B | 4,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.60 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 17.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 36.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 29.57 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement