It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FWRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePTLO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FWRG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTLO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.23% price change this week, while PTLO (@Restaurants) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +25.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.
FWRG is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
PTLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
FWRG | PTLO | FWRG / PTLO | |
Capitalization | 1.08B | 666M | 161% |
EBITDA | 98.7M | 90.6M | 109% |
Gain YTD | -11.692 | -32.266 | 36% |
P/E Ratio | 52.91 | 25.69 | 206% |
Revenue | 997M | 714M | 140% |
Total Cash | 51.1M | 18.5M | 276% |
Total Debt | 779M | 576M | 135% |
FWRG | PTLO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 26 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 3 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FWRG | 100% | +1.66% | ||
FRSH - FWRG | 49% Loosely correlated | +8.25% | ||
PTLO - FWRG | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
TXRH - FWRG | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
DAVE - FWRG | 33% Loosely correlated | +5.67% | ||
DIN - FWRG | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTLO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PTLO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PTLO | 100% | +1.51% | ||
FRSH - PTLO | 52% Loosely correlated | +8.25% | ||
FWRG - PTLO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
CAKE - PTLO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
PZZA - PTLO | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
JACK - PTLO | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.82% | ||
More |