FWRG
Price
$13.03
Change
+$0.40 (+3.17%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
804.11M
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PTLO
Price
$4.97
Change
+$0.20 (+4.19%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
360.42M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs PTLO

FWRG vs PTLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. PTLO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a Hold and PTLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FWRG: $13.03 vs. PTLO: $4.97)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and PTLO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 51% vs. PTLO: 141%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $804.11M vs. PTLO: $360.42M
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $804.11M. PTLO’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $360.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $191.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePTLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PTLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PTLO is a better buy in the long-term than FWRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTLO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PTLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the short-term than PTLO.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while PTLO (@Restaurants) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

PTLO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.26% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWRG($804M) has a higher market cap than PTLO($360M). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than PTLO: FWRG (46.54) vs PTLO (27.69). PTLO YTD gains are higher at: 9.471 vs. FWRG (-13.594). FWRG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 108M vs. PTLO (70.8M). PTLO (24M) and FWRG (23.6M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PTLO has less debt than FWRG: PTLO (689M) vs FWRG (1.03B). FWRG has higher revenues than PTLO: FWRG (1.27B) vs PTLO (738M).
FWRGPTLOFWRG / PTLO
Capitalization804M360M223%
EBITDA108M70.8M153%
Gain YTD-13.5949.471-144%
P/E Ratio46.5427.69168%
Revenue1.27B738M172%
Total Cash23.6M24M98%
Total Debt1.03B689M150%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGPTLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PTLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNVMX23.920.26
+1.10%
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR6
ALTFX138.621.21
+0.88%
AB Sustainable Global Thematic A
NSEIX24.200.16
+0.67%
Nicholas Equity Income I
MDVZX10.24N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
FBALX35.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Balanced

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+3.17%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
PTLO - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
BJRI - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
DIN - FWRG
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.22%
CAKE - FWRG
43%
Loosely correlated
+6.38%
More

PTLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTLO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PTLO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTLO
1D Price
Change %
PTLO100%
+4.19%
FRSH - PTLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
FWRG - PTLO
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
WING - PTLO
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
SG - PTLO
39%
Loosely correlated
+6.23%
WEN - PTLO
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
More