FWRG
Price
$17.66
Change
+$0.10 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
38 days until earnings call
RTBRF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.11 (-6.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
228.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs RTBRF

Header iconFWRG vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FWRG vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$17.66
Change+$0.10 (+0.57%)
Volume$370.24K
Capitalization1.08B
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.60
Change-$0.11 (-6.43%)
Volume$200
Capitalization228.61M
FWRG vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. RTBRF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a Buy and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FWRG: $17.66 vs. RTBRF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 36% vs. RTBRF: 49%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $1.08B vs. RTBRF: $228.61M
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.08B. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $228.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the long-term than RTBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.29% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was -6.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWRG($1.08B) has a higher market cap than RTBRF($229M). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than RTBRF: FWRG (103.88) vs RTBRF (12.34). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: 1.911 vs. FWRG (-5.105). RTBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157M vs. FWRG (91.9M). RTBRF has higher revenues than FWRG: RTBRF (1.37B) vs FWRG (1.06B).
FWRGRTBRFFWRG / RTBRF
Capitalization1.08B229M470%
EBITDA91.9M157M59%
Gain YTD-5.1051.911-267%
P/E Ratio103.8812.34842%
Revenue1.06B1.37B77%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt837MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRSRX54.880.47
+0.86%
Putnam Research R
AMEIX35.400.30
+0.85%
American Century Equity Growth I
VADCX70.770.35
+0.50%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 C
RYHAX103.690.14
+0.14%
Rydex Health Care H
SREAX13.660.01
+0.07%
PGIM Select Real Estate A

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+2.67%
CAKE - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
KRUS - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
DIN - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
DRI - FWRG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More