Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs NPFCX
FWTFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs NPFCX
FWTFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWTFX (4B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWTFX (0.07). FWTFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWTFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWTFX (1.32). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWTFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. NPFCX (8.97). FWTFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.58 vs. NPFCX (8.19).
| FWTFX | NPFCX | FWTFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.47 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.47 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.879 | 4.060 | 588% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.33 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 8.97 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.07 | 34.83 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.58 | 8.19 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.53 | 107.01 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement