Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPCX
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPCX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$35.73
Change+$0.20 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$67.75
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWTFX (3.28B). FWTFX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: FWTFX (0.31) vs RNPCX (0.23). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPCX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. FWTFX (-4.45). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. FWTFX (21.84).
| FWTFX | RNPCX | FWTFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.06 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.06 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.992 | 12.785 | 47% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 156B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.45 | 10.76 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.78 | 45.00 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.84 | 43.51 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.23 | 83.15 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement