Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPCX
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPCX
FWTFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWTFX (3.91B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPCX (0.71) vs FWTFX (0.07). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). FWTFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). FWTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. RNPCX (6.23). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.33 vs. FWTFX (8.54).
| FWTFX | RNPCX | FWTFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.05 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.05 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.996 | 4.726 | 317% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.71 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 6.23 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.22 | 31.95 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.54 | 10.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.67 | 101.14 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement