Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPEX
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$37.48
Change-$0.46 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.94
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWTFX (3.57B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPEX (0.46) vs FWTFX (0.28). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. FWTFX (-3.50). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.72 vs. FWTFX (11.61).
| FWTFX | RNPEX | FWTFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.184 | 16.467 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.46 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.50 | 11.64 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 46.03 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 26.72 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.32 | 87.04 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement