Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPEX
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$33.92
Change+$0.33 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$66.34
Change+$0.41 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
FWTFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FWTFX (3.08B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPEX (0.51) vs FWTFX (0.33). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. FWTFX (-8.04). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.46 vs. FWTFX (17.19).
| FWTFX | RNPEX | FWTFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.76 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.356 | 8.915 | -4% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 150B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.51 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.04 | 9.22 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 28.62 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | 43.46 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.49 | 77.25 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement