Ad is loading...
FWWFX vs NPFCX
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$31.67
Change+$0.43 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$56.83
Change+$1.08 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FWWFX (2.95B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWWFX (0.81) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWWFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWWFX (35 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWWFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. FWWFX (-10.35). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. FWWFX (24.91).
| FWWFX | NPFCX | FWWFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.230 | -1.848 | 554% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.35 | 3.21 | -322% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.32 | 9.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.91 | 41.75 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.19 | 48.98 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...