Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs NPFCX
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.09
Change+$0.21 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$67.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWWFX (3.57B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWWFX (0.65) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWWFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWWFX (36 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWWFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. FWWFX (-2.60). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. FWWFX (15.29).
| FWWFX | NPFCX | FWWFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.724 | 15.734 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | 10.60 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.12 | 43.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 22.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.82 | 78.42 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement