Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs NPFCX
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs NPFCX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.90
Change-$0.39 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$69.08
Change+$0.39 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (3.51B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWWFX (0.67) vs NPFCX (0.00). FWWFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWWFX (35 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWWFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. FWWFX (0.80). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.18 vs. FWWFX (18.93).
| FWWFX | NPFCX | FWWFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.655 | 19.309 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 12.78 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.82 | 61.00 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 30.18 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.51 | 91.09 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement