Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs NPFCX
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs NPFCX
FWWFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (4B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWWFX (0.47) vs NPFCX (0.33). FWWFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWWFX (36 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.77). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWWFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.24 vs. NPFCX (12.34). FWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. NPFCX (12.98).
| FWWFX | NPFCX | FWWFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.47 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.47 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.185 | 6.762 | 313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.24 | 12.34 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 39.59 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 12.98 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.96 | 100.52 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement