Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPCX
FWWFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPCX
FWWFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (4B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPCX (0.70) vs FWWFX (0.47). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). RNPCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.77). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.24 vs. RNPCX (13.03). FWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. RNPCX (15.88).
| FWWFX | RNPCX | FWWFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.05 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.05 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.185 | 6.943 | 305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.24 | 13.03 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 42.11 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 15.88 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.96 | 108.06 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement