Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$38.88
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWWFX (3.57B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWWFX (0.65). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. FWWFX (-2.60). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. FWWFX (15.29).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.724 | 16.763 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | 12.05 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.12 | 47.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 28.33 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.82 | 90.02 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers