Ad is loading...
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$31.67
Change+$0.43 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$61.09
Change+$1.17 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FWWFX (2.95B). RNPFX (0.84) and FWWFX (0.81) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. FWWFX (-10.35). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.11 vs. FWWFX (24.91).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.230 | -1.531 | 668% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.35 | 4.59 | -226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.32 | 12.22 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.91 | 49.11 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.19 | 58.70 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...