Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$34.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.24
Change-$0.25 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. FWWFX (3.08B). RNPFX (0.77) and FWWFX (0.76) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. FWWFX (-7.76). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.97 vs. FWWFX (21.07).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | 8.785 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 151B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.76 | 9.55 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 30.09 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.07 | 44.97 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.95 | 79.50 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers