Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$36.99
Change+$0.21 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.17
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.36B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. FWWFX (3.28B). RNPFX (0.74) and FWWFX (0.72) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. FWWFX (-4.12). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.33 vs. FWWFX (25.18).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.690 | 13.104 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 155B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | 11.57 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.92 | 47.16 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.18 | 47.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.39 | 88.89 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement