Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.90
Change-$0.39 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.59
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (3.51B). RNPFX (0.70) and FWWFX (0.67) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.29 vs. FWWFX (0.80). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.89 vs. FWWFX (18.93).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.655 | 20.229 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 14.29 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.82 | 65.52 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 36.89 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.51 | 103.51 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement