Ad is loading...
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$31.00
Change-$1.51 (-4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$59.13
Change-$2.45 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWWFX (2.95B). RNPFX (0.84) and FWWFX (0.81) have matching dividends . FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. FWWFX (-10.36). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.60 vs. FWWFX (48.98).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.580 | -0.741 | 888% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 139B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.36 | 2.65 | -390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.38 | 3.11 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.98 | 70.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.18 | 64.56 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers