Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$38.30
Change+$0.19 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.93
Change+$0.22 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.96B
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FWWFX (3.37B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPFX (0.74) vs FWWFX (0.70). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.31 vs. FWWFX (6.63). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.45 vs. FWWFX (20.91).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.46 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.511 | 14.329 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 157B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 17.31 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.98 | 38.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.91 | 39.45 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.75 | 87.11 | 72% |