Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWWFX (4B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FWWFX (0.47). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWWFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.07 vs. RNPFX (9.20). FWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.02 vs. RNPFX (14.28).
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.45 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.45 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.138 | 4.621 | 436% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.18 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.07 | 9.20 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.89 | 41.06 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.02 | 14.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.29 | 128.45 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement