Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPFX
FWWFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWWFX (4.16B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPFX (1.19) vs FWWFX (0.46). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWWFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.59 vs. RNPFX (5.69). FWWFX (14.36) and RNPFX (13.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWFX | RNPFX | FWWFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.45 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.45 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.116 | 4.040 | 399% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.16B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.59 | 5.69 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 34.39 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.36 | 13.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.60 | 107.81 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement