Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPGX
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.90
Change-$0.39 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$74.75
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (3.51B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPGX (0.75) vs FWWFX (0.67). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWWFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.35 vs. FWWFX (0.80). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.14 vs. FWWFX (18.93).
| FWWFX | RNPGX | FWWFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.41 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.41 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.655 | 20.274 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 14.35 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.82 | 65.68 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 37.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.51 | 103.92 | 77% |