Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPGX
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPGX
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWWFX (4B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FWWFX (0.47). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWWFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.07 vs. RNPGX (9.26). FWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.02 vs. RNPGX (14.54).
| FWWFX | RNPGX | FWWFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.40 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.40 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.138 | 4.655 | 433% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.23 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.07 | 9.26 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.89 | 41.31 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.02 | 14.54 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.29 | 129.05 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement