Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPGX
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPGX
FWWFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWWFX (3.93B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWWFX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FWWFX (0.49). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWWFX (36 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWWFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). FWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. RNPGX (5.23). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.60 vs. FWWFX (10.33).
| FWWFX | RNPGX | FWWFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.40 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.40 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.749 | 8.575 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 5.23 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.04 | 48.72 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.33 | 15.60 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.10 | 112.82 | 82% |