Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs FZALX
FWWMX vs FZALX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs FZALX
FWWMX vs FZALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. FZALX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and FZALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FZALX (7.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FZALX: FWWMX (1.41) vs FZALX (0.83). FWWMX was incepted earlier than FZALX: FWWMX (6 years) vs FZALX (13 years). FZALX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FZALX (15.00). FZALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: FZALX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FZALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.18 vs. FWWMX (6.72). FZALX return over 5 years is better than : 92.37 vs. FWWMX (30.28).
| FWWMX | FZALX | FWWMX / FZALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.453 | 9.944 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 7.3B | 2,988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.83 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 18.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 76.43 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 92.37 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers