Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs GSPCX
FWWMX vs GSPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs GSPCX
FWWMX vs GSPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. GSPCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and GSPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSPCX (1.56B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs GSPCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than GSPCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs GSPCX (29 years). GSPCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: FWWMX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. GSPCX (-15.99). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. GSPCX (-34.32).
| FWWMX | GSPCX | FWWMX / GSPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.75 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 10.908 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.56B | 14,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -15.99 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | -4.96 | -609% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -34.32 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -29.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers