Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs GSPFX
FWWMX vs GSPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs GSPFX
FWWMX vs GSPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSPFX (26.9M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than GSPFX: FWWMX (1.44) vs GSPFX (0.48). FWWMX was incepted earlier than GSPFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs GSPFX (10 years). GSPFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). GSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPFX: FWWMX (250) vs GSPFX (5000). GSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. FWWMX (5.76). GSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.15 vs. FWWMX (30.81).
| FWWMX | GSPFX | FWWMX / GSPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.50 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.65 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 12.176 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 26.9M | 814,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.48 | 302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 12.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 41.66 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 35.15 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement