Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs GSURX
FWWMX vs GSURX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs GSURX
FWWMX vs GSURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. GSURX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and GSURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSURX (1.14B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than GSURX: FWWMX (1.41) vs GSURX (0.06). FWWMX was incepted earlier than GSURX: FWWMX (6 years) vs GSURX (19 years). GSURX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). GSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). GSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: GSURX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. GSURX (-0.21). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. GSURX (-2.52).
| FWWMX | GSURX | FWWMX / GSURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.21 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 7.968 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.14B | 19,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.06 | 2,390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -0.21 | -995% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 28.03 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -2.52 | -1,197% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers