Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs GSURX
FWWMX vs GSURX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs GSURX
FWWMX vs GSURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. GSURX (1.17B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than GSURX: FWWMX (1.40) vs GSURX (0.06). FWWMX was incepted earlier than GSURX: FWWMX (6 years) vs GSURX (19 years). GSURX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). GSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). GSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: GSURX (0) vs FWWMX (250). GSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. FWWMX (8.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. GSURX (4.27).
| FWWMX | GSURX | FWWMX / GSURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.21 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 8.450 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 1.17B | 18,369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.06 | 2,360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 11.65 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 34.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 4.27 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement