Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HCPCX
FWWMX vs HCPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HCPCX
FWWMX vs HCPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. HCPCX (3.75B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HCPCX: FWWMX (1.44) vs HCPCX (0.11). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HCPCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HCPCX (12 years). HCPCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HCPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). HCPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: HCPCX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. HCPCX (3.13). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. HCPCX (-0.13).
| FWWMX | HCPCX | FWWMX / HCPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.18 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.18 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.135 | 7.652 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 3.75B | 5,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.11 | 1,270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 3.13 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.04 | 30.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.89 | -0.13 | -23,665% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement