Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. HGIFX (11.6B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HGIFX: FWWMX (1.44) vs HGIFX (0.54). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HGIFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HGIFX (9 years). HGIFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIFX: FWWMX (250) vs HGIFX (1000000). HGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. FWWMX (5.76). FWWMX (30.81) and HGIFX (30.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWMX | HGIFX | FWWMX / HGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 8.752 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 11.6B | 1,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.54 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 6.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 36.82 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 30.57 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement