Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. HGIFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and HGIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIFX (11.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HGIFX: FWWMX (1.41) vs HGIFX (0.53). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HGIFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HGIFX (10 years). HGIFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIFX: FWWMX (250) vs HGIFX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HGIFX (0.18). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. HGIFX (27.73).
| FWWMX | HGIFX | FWWMX / HGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.660 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 11.3B | 1,929% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.53 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 0.18 | 1,183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 37.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 27.73 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers