Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HGIFX
FWWMX vs HGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIFX (11.6B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HGIFX: FWWMX (1.40) vs HGIFX (0.54). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HGIFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HGIFX (9 years). HGIFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIFX: FWWMX (250) vs HGIFX (1000000). HGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. FWWMX (8.15). HGIFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.66 vs. FWWMX (30.36).
| FWWMX | HGIFX | FWWMX / HGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.36 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 7.626 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 11.6B | 1,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.54 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 9.79 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 39.35 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 33.66 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers