Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HSTAX
FWWMX vs HSTAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HSTAX
FWWMX vs HSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. HSTAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and HSTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HSTAX (1.16B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HSTAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs HSTAX (1.15). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HSTAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HSTAX (49 years). HSTAX (0.52) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). HSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: HSTAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. HSTAX (-6.22). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. HSTAX (-14.75).
| FWWMX | HSTAX | FWWMX / HSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.52 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.52 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.444 | -8.213 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.16B | 18,761% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.15 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | -6.22 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.29 | -2.82 | -1,075% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | -14.75 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers