Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs ICAFX
FWWMX vs ICAFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs ICAFX
FWWMX vs ICAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ICAFX (186B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than ICAFX: FWWMX (1.44) vs ICAFX (1.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than ICAFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs ICAFX (18 years). ICAFX (0.37) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). ICAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX (250) and ICAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ICAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. FWWMX (6.69). ICAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.97 vs. FWWMX (30.69).
| FWWMX | ICAFX | FWWMX / ICAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.37 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.37 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.980 | 9.206 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 186B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.00 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.69 | 9.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.65 | 49.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.69 | 41.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers