Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCFX (6.04B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: FWWMX (1.40) vs JLCFX (0.31). FWWMX was incepted earlier than JLCFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs JLCFX (17 years). JLCFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: JLCFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. JLCFX (1.65). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. JLCFX (-3.16).
| FWWMX | JLCFX | FWWMX / JLCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 0.726 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.04B | 3,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.31 | 459% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 1.65 | 493% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 15.00 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | -3.16 | -960% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement