Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. JLCFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and JLCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCFX (5.88B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: FWWMX (1.41) vs JLCFX (0.30). FWWMX was incepted earlier than JLCFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs JLCFX (17 years). JLCFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: JLCFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. JLCFX (-3.71). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. JLCFX (-5.92).
| FWWMX | JLCFX | FWWMX / JLCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 4.113 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.88B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.30 | 476% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -3.71 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 16.05 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -5.92 | -510% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers