Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs JLCFX
FWWMX vs JLCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. JLCFX (6.22B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: FWWMX (1.44) vs JLCFX (0.31). FWWMX was incepted earlier than JLCFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs JLCFX (17 years). JLCFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). JLCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: JLCFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. JLCFX (-0.23). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. JLCFX (-3.57).
| FWWMX | JLCFX | FWWMX / JLCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 3.060 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.22B | 3,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.31 | 459% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | -0.23 | -2,478% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 13.02 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | -3.57 | -864% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement