Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs JLCYX
FWWMX vs JLCYX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs JLCYX
FWWMX vs JLCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. JLCYX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and JLCYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. JLCYX (5.88B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than JLCYX: FWWMX (1.41) vs JLCYX (0.09). FWWMX was incepted earlier than JLCYX: FWWMX (6 years) vs JLCYX (15 years). JLCYX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). JLCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). JLCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: JLCYX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. JLCYX (-3.92). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. JLCYX (-6.68).
| FWWMX | JLCYX | FWWMX / JLCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.15 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 3.953 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.88B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.09 | 1,637% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -3.92 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 15.28 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -6.68 | -452% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement