Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMAX
FWWMX vs LAMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMAX
FWWMX vs LAMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LAMAX (4.98B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LAMAX (0.62). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMAX (24 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMAX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMAX: FWWMX (250) vs LAMAX (1000). LAMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.69 vs. FWWMX (8.11). LAMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.10 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | LAMAX | FWWMX / LAMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 7.526 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.98B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 16.69 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 54.28 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 40.10 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement