Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMAX
FWWMX vs LAMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMAX
FWWMX vs LAMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMAX (5.04B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMAX: FWWMX (1.42) vs LAMAX (0.61). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMAX (25 years). LAMAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMAX (30.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMAX: FWWMX (250) vs LAMAX (1000). LAMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. FWWMX (7.53). LAMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. FWWMX (32.16).
| FWWMX | LAMAX | FWWMX / LAMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 9.689 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.04B | 4,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.61 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 11.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 52.94 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 34.49 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.87 | - |