Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMCX
FWWMX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMCX
FWWMX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LAMCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and LAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMCX (4.94B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LAMCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMCX (25 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMCX (30.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FWWMX (250) vs LAMCX (1000). LAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. LAMCX (28.51).
| FWWMX | LAMCX | FWWMX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 7.315 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.94B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 5.21 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 45.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 28.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers