Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LAMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and LAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMFX (4.94B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LAMFX (0.73). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMFX (19 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMFX (30.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.42 vs. FWWMX (2.09). LAMFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.67 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | LAMFX | FWWMX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.079 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.94B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.73 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.42 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 49.84 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 34.67 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement