Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMFX (4.97B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LAMFX (0.74). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMFX (19 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMFX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.88 vs. FWWMX (7.02). LAMFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. FWWMX (29.14).
| FWWMX | LAMFX | FWWMX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 7.808 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.97B | 4,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.74 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 15.88 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 54.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.14 | 41.52 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement