Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMFX
FWWMX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LAMFX (5.03B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FWWMX (1.44) vs LAMFX (0.73). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMFX (19 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMFX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMFX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. FWWMX (5.76). LAMFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.94 vs. FWWMX (30.81).
| FWWMX | LAMFX | FWWMX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 9.035 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 5.03B | 4,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.73 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 13.31 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 52.06 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 39.94 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement