Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMHX
FWWMX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMHX
FWWMX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LAMHX (4.98B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LAMHX (0.82). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMHX (11 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMHX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMHX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.18 vs. FWWMX (8.11). LAMHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.59 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | LAMHX | FWWMX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 7.727 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.98B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.82 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 17.18 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 56.11 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 42.59 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement