Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMHX
FWWMX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMHX
FWWMX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LAMHX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and LAMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMHX (5.04B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FWWMX (1.42) vs LAMHX (0.82). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMHX (11 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMHX (30.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMHX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. FWWMX (7.22). LAMHX return over 5 years is better than : 36.39 vs. FWWMX (32.06).
| FWWMX | LAMHX | FWWMX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.824 | 10.025 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.04B | 4,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.82 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 11.54 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 54.10 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 36.39 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement