Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LAMRX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and LAMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMRX (4.9B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LAMRX (0.37). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMRX (19 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMRX (30.00). LAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMRX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. FWWMX (1.33). LAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 31.81 vs. FWWMX (29.20).
| FWWMX | LAMRX | FWWMX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.401 | 7.271 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.9B | 4,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.37 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 5.84 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.99 | 47.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.20 | 31.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement