Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LAMRX (4.98B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LAMRX (0.40). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMRX (19 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMRX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMRX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.33 vs. FWWMX (8.11). LAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.56 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | LAMRX | FWWMX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 7.430 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.98B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.40 | 350% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 16.33 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 53.06 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 38.56 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement