Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMRX
FWWMX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LAMRX (5.03B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FWWMX (1.42) vs LAMRX (0.38). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMRX (19 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMRX (30.00). LAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMRX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. FWWMX (8.76). LAMRX (34.08) and FWWMX (33.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWMX | LAMRX | FWWMX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.056 | 9.172 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 5.03B | 4,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.38 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 11.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.77 | 49.88 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.80 | 34.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement