Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMSX
FWWMX vs LAMSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMSX
FWWMX vs LAMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMSX (4.98B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LAMSX (0.62). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMSX (11 years). LAMSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LAMSX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LAMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.83 vs. FWWMX (8.15). LAMSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.78 vs. FWWMX (30.36).
| FWWMX | LAMSX | FWWMX / LAMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 7.737 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.98B | 4,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.62 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 16.83 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 53.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 40.78 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement