Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LAMSX
FWWMX vs LAMSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LAMSX
FWWMX vs LAMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LAMSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and LAMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAMSX (4.94B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LAMSX (0.61). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LAMSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LAMSX (11 years). LAMSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LAMSX (30.00). LAMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LAMSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LAMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. FWWMX (2.09). LAMSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.84 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | LAMSX | FWWMX / LAMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 7.850 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.94B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.61 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.10 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 48.57 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 32.84 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers