Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LCSTX
FWWMX vs LCSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LCSTX
FWWMX vs LCSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LCSTX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and LCSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCSTX (94.3M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LCSTX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LCSTX (0.01). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LCSTX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LCSTX (11 years). LCSTX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LCSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). LCSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LCSTX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LCSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. LCSTX (21.44).
| FWWMX | LCSTX | FWWMX / LCSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.27 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.984 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 94.3M | 231,177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.01 | 14,135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 5.48 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 33.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 21.44 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 204.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement