Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LMUSX
FWWMX vs LMUSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LMUSX
FWWMX vs LMUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LMUSX (537M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LMUSX: FWWMX (1.42) vs LMUSX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LMUSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LMUSX (18 years). LMUSX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LMUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). LMUSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LMUSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LMUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. FWWMX (7.00). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. LMUSX (28.59).
| FWWMX | LMUSX | FWWMX / LMUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.05 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.24 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.016 | 8.956 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 537M | 40,782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 17.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.00 | 61.09 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 28.59 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement