Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. LRMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and LRMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LRMAX (4.94B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LRMAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs LRMAX (0.81). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LRMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LRMAX (9 years). LRMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LRMAX (30.00). LRMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LRMAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LRMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. FWWMX (2.09). LRMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.25 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | LRMAX | FWWMX / LRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.097 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.94B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.81 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.52 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 50.25 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 35.25 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |