Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LRMAX (4.99B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LRMAX: FWWMX (1.44) vs LRMAX (0.82). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LRMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LRMAX (9 years). LRMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LRMAX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LRMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LRMAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LRMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. FWWMX (6.60). LRMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.53 vs. FWWMX (32.70).
| FWWMX | LRMAX | FWWMX / LRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.150 | 8.411 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.99B | 4,367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.82 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 12.93 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.83 | 54.88 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.70 | 41.53 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers