Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LRMAX (5.02B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LRMAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs LRMAX (0.82). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LRMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LRMAX (9 years). LRMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). LRMAX (30.00) and FWWMX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LRMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LRMAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LRMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.18 vs. FWWMX (8.18). LRMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.67 vs. FWWMX (31.22).
| FWWMX | LRMAX | FWWMX / LRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.527 | 8.822 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.02B | 4,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.82 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 17.18 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.47 | 54.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.22 | 44.67 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement