Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs LRMAX
FWWMX vs LRMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LRMAX (5.04B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than LRMAX: FWWMX (1.42) vs LRMAX (0.82). FWWMX was incepted earlier than LRMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs LRMAX (9 years). LRMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LRMAX (30.00). LRMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: LRMAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). LRMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. FWWMX (7.53). LRMAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.80 vs. FWWMX (32.16).
| FWWMX | LRMAX | FWWMX / LRMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 9.904 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.04B | 4,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.82 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 11.90 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 54.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 36.80 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement