Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MAAKX
FWWMX vs MAAKX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MAAKX
FWWMX vs MAAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MAAKX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MAAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MAAKX (305M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MAAKX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MAAKX (0.58). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MAAKX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MAAKX (42 years). MAAKX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MAAKX (20.64). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAAKX: FWWMX (250) vs MAAKX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MAAKX (-1.40). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MAAKX (-9.51).
| FWWMX | MAAKX | FWWMX / MAAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 12.596 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 305M | 71,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.58 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -1.40 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 15.22 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -9.51 | -317% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers