Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. MCSSX (353M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: FWWMX (1.44) vs MCSSX (0.06). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MCSSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MCSSX (18 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: FWWMX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. MCSSX (-3.28). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. MCSSX (14.41).
| FWWMX | MCSSX | FWWMX / MCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 5.837 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 353M | 62,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.06 | 2,252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | -3.28 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 22.13 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 14.41 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement