Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MCSSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MCSSX (324M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MCSSX (0.06). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MCSSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MCSSX (19 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: FWWMX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MCSSX (-5.23). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MCSSX (7.39).
| FWWMX | MCSSX | FWWMX / MCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 3.992 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 324M | 67,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.06 | 2,227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -5.23 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 19.73 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 7.39 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers