Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MCSSX
FWWMX vs MCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MCSSX (345M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs MCSSX (0.07). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MCSSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MCSSX (18 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: FWWMX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. MCSSX (-4.60). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. MCSSX (12.42).
| FWWMX | MCSSX | FWWMX / MCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.16 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 1.845 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 345M | 63,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.07 | 2,078% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | -4.60 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 21.71 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 12.42 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSPQX | 19.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium C | |||
| HLMOX | 9.38 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv | |||
| BIRIX | 26.52 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr Instl | |||
| GSIQX | 22.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R | |||
| GABPX | 54.18 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income P | |||