Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MLVBX
FWWMX vs MLVBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MLVBX
FWWMX vs MLVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MLVBX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and MLVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MLVBX (311M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MLVBX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MLVBX (0.04). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MLVBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MLVBX (13 years). MLVBX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MLVBX (23.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVBX: FWWMX (250) vs MLVBX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. MLVBX (-5.59). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.28 vs. MLVBX (-14.14).
| FWWMX | MLVBX | FWWMX / MLVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.68 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.463 | 6.232 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 311M | 70,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.04 | 3,445% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | -5.59 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.81 | 1.90 | 1,517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.28 | -14.14 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers